🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are observing closely to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a rising chorus of states are considering parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our children's childhood". Legislation could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has called on lawmakers to pass a proposal lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for minors unless guardian approval is provided. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a solid foundation," said the MEP behind the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by strong research".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Charities have raised warnings. An organization set up by the loved ones of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to dangerous online content contends that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for young users," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, legislation is mostly happening at the regional level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a rule restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted bills demanding adult authorization for minors to open social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from some politicians to follow Australia's example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Apart from the West, further nations are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies take a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The body notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

As this worldwide discussion continues, the policies of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers internationally are increasingly willing to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.